Derar H. Abdel-Qader
Faculty of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan
Khalid Awad Al-Kubaisi
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
Nathir M Obeidat
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
Rana Ibrahim
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
Nadia Al Mazrouei
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
Eman Massad
Public Health Institute, The University of Jordan
Esra’ Taybeh
Department of Applied Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Isra University, Amman, Jordan
Sahar Abed Al-Qader Jaradat
Faculty of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan
Shorouq Saleh Al-Omoush
Faculty of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan
Alia Hani Saleh
Faculty of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan
Background: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is an efficient time-based exercise type with an overwhelming and positive outcome on cardiovascular health, ahead of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). This exciting twist on high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has, to date, shifted researchers’ focus to non-exercise controls and MICT cardiovascular elements such as VO₂ max, blood pressure, vascular function, lipid profiles, and Resting Heart Rate (RHR). Methods: This interval training meta-analysis includes only HIIT studies with at least 80% of ages 20–40 at max heart rate from 4 weeks (assuming 80% of MHR max). HIIT shows improvement on the compared metrics compared with the non-exercise control: VO₂ max (4.3 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹), systolic (4 mm), and diastolic (3 mm). Findings: Improvements in endothelial function and arterial stiffness, with reduced pulse wave velocity, are noted. HIIT is superior to MICT, with gains in VO₂ max of 3–4 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹ and central systolic blood pressure, indicating marginally better vascular function and arterial stiffness. HIIT with gains identified seeks work. 2 or more work interval durations, 3 to 5 session frequencies, at least 8 weeks of total progression times, and work: no work ratios of 1:1 give the best results. Conclusion: Compliance remains high in supervised intervals, with minimal safety events; yet long-term sustainability beyond 12 months is less well substantiated. Comprehensive HIIT training remains a safe intervention with many benefits, and it can be easily tailored to assist individuals at risk in improving their cardiovascular health.